
Self-hosted team messaging — channels, video, and compliance.
Rocket.Chat is a secure team communication platform with 42k+ GitHub stars — a Slack alternative with omnichannel and federation support.
Compare Rocket.Chat with Zulip and Microsoft Teams before you choose your stack.
| Rocket.Chat | Slack | |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT (open source) | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Self-hosted available | Cloud SaaS |
| Data control | Your infrastructure | Vendor infrastructure |
| Customization | Full source access | Limited to vendor features |
| Cost | Free open-source software | Subscription or usage fees |
Choose Rocket.Chat if you want open-source code, self-hosting options, and full control over your data and deployment.
Choose Slack if you prefer a managed proprietary product with vendor support and minimal setup.
Browse more open-source alternatives to Slack, or explore other tools in Collaboration.
| License | MIT |
| Stack | TypeScript, Node.js |
| Self-hosted | Yes |
| Cloud | rocket.chat |
| Database | MongoDB |
docker run -d -p 3000:3000 -e ROOT_URL=http://localhost rocketchat/rocket.chat
Scaling guides available for high availability.
Yes. Rocket.Chat is open source under MIT. You can self-host it at no software cost — you only pay for infrastructure or optional managed services.
Rocket.Chat gives you source code access, self-hosting, and data ownership. Slack is a proprietary product focused on managed convenience. See the comparison table above for a side-by-side breakdown.
Yes. Rocket.Chat supports self-hosted deployment, which is a core reason teams choose it over Slack. Check the Getting started or Self-hosting section for install commands.
Rocket.Chat is actively maintained with a strong open-source community. Many teams run it in production as a Collaboration alternative to Slack. Review the At a glance table for license and stack details.
Browse alternatives to Slack for more open-source options, including tools compared to Zulip. Explore the full Collaboration category for related projects.