Quiet

Quiet

Peer-to-peer team chat over Tor — no servers, no phone number, no metadata.

Open source alternative to:SlackDiscordRocket.Chat

OSSBase Rating

6.1/ 10

Score based on deployment ease, documentation quality, community activity, production readiness, and long-term maintainability.

Experimental

OSSBase Evaluation

Deployment ease★★★★★
Documentation★★☆☆☆
Community★★★☆☆
Production ready★☆☆☆☆
Maintenance★★★★★
Scalability★★☆☆☆
Security★★☆☆☆
Learning curve★★★★★

Best for:

  • Privacy-conscious small teams
  • Low-stakes chat
  • Testing P2P concepts

Not ideal for:

  • Production requirements
  • Large teams
  • Guaranteed delivery matters

Quiet: Open Source Alternative to Slack and Discord

Quiet is an open-source, peer-to-peer team chat that takes a fundamentally different architecture from server-based tools: messages sync directly between members' devices over Tor, with no central server, no phone number, and no email required to create a community. It's GPL-3.0 licensed.

Important: Quiet's own site currently states it is in beta and "shouldn't be used for activities requiring security." Several features common to chat apps — direct messages, user profiles, @mentions, message deletion, and account recovery — are listed as "coming soon" rather than shipped. Evaluate it as an early-stage project, not a finished product.

Core features

  • Peer-to-peer sync over Tor — no central server, messages travel directly between team members' devices.
  • No phone number or email required — a community can be created without either.
  • Channels for organizing conversation, similar to Slack.
  • File sharing with no stated file-size limit, plus drag-and-drop and copy/paste for images.
  • End-to-end encryption between member devices.
  • Cross-platform — desktop (macOS, Windows, Linux) and mobile (Android via Google Play/F-Droid, iOS via TestFlight beta).

What is Quiet?

Quiet is built for people who want maximum metadata privacy and zero server infrastructure — there's literally nothing to host, because the network is peer-to-peer over Tor. That's a very different tradeoff from a self-hosted server like Rocket.Chat: you gain metadata privacy and no hosting bill, but currently give up basic features like DMs and always-on delivery when peers are offline.

Use cases

  • Small groups experimenting with metadata-resistant communication, where avoiding a central server matters more than feature completeness.
  • Privacy researchers and activists evaluating P2P/Tor-based messaging designs.
  • Not yet a good fit for teams that need reliable direct messages, account recovery, or production-grade security guarantees — see the limitations below.

Limitations

  • Quiet explicitly labels itself beta software not ready for security-critical use, by its own project's wording.
  • No direct messages, user profiles, @mentions, message deletion, or account recovery yet — these are roadmap items, not shipped features.
  • Being peer-to-peer with no server means message delivery depends on peers being online; there's no always-on server holding messages for offline members the way Rocket.Chat or Slack do.

Which one should you choose?

  • Curious about P2P/Tor-based chat and comfortable with beta software? Quiet is a genuinely different architecture worth exploring.
  • Need dependable DMs, offline delivery, and account recovery today? Quiet isn't there yet — Rocket.Chat, Campfire, or Slack are the dependable choices.
  • Want strong privacy with a more finished product? Element or Wire offer end-to-end encryption with far more mature feature sets.

Quiet: The P2P Experiment

Quiet isn't a team chat platform in the traditional sense. It's a proof-of-concept for peer-to-peer messaging over Tor, where every participant runs the app and messages sync across overlapping-online peer chains.

The Reality of Quiet

Deployment tested

AspectDetails
MethodDesktop/mobile app install (Tor bundled)
Time≈3 minutes
Required servicesNone (Tor is bundled)
DifficultyTrivial — just install and run

The catch: Message delivery depends on peer availability. If a sender and receiver aren't both online, messages queue across peer bridges. There's no "always-on" guarantee. Quiet explicitly states it's not audited and should not be used for security-critical comms.

Hidden limitation: Quiet is explicitly beta and unaudited. The project flags its own status: "Quiet is not audited and should not be used when privacy and security are critical." Use this for low-stakes internal comms, not for anything resembling production deployments.

OSSBase Take

Quiet is fascinating as a pure P2P experiment. The ease of setup is genuine—no server, no DevOps, no infrastructure. But the stability guarantees are not there.

Use Quiet if:

  • You want to experiment with P2P messaging concepts
  • Low-stakes chat is acceptable
  • Offline delivery is not required

Avoid if:

  • You need guaranteed message delivery
  • Your organization requires security audits
  • You have compliance requirements

Sources

Screenshots

Quiet screenshot 1

Tags

chatmessagingcommunityself-hostedprivacy

Built with

TypeScript